White Papers

Indium Corporation conducts extensive research on the soldering fundamentals for Surface Mount Technology and other electronics applications.

Browse our library for abstracts of some of the most popular published articles that you may find useful in your efforts to improve your process results. All papers in our library are available for download.

Check the box next to each paper you want to download. You may download as many papers as you wish. After selecting papers and completing the contact information form on this page, the paper(s) will be e-mailed to you at the e-mail address you provide.

    Papers about solder appearance

  • Prospect of Lead Free Alternatives for Reflow Soldering

    by Dr. Ning-Cheng Lee, Dr. Benlih Huang

    The prospects of 10 major lead-free solder alloys for being widely used for reflow soldering are studied in this work. Compatibility of those alloys with a variety of representative flux chemistries is considered essential, and is determined for performance in handling- ability, including shelf life and tack time, and soldering capability, including solder balling, wetting, and solder joint appearance. Results indicate that the control 63Sn37Pb is still the most compatible alloy, rated 27.1 in compatibility out of a full scale 30 when using warm profile. The primary factor which distinguishes 63Sn37Pb from the rest alloys is the soldering performance, particularly the wetting and solder appearance. As to the solder balling, although 63Sn37Pb is also the best, it is fairly close to the best lead-free systems. Among the lead-free options, both SnAgBi alloys studied here, 91.7Sn3.5Ag4.8Bi and 90.5Sn7.5Bi2Ag, turn out to be on the top of lead-free systems, rated 22.9 and 22.8, respectively. This is mainly attributed to the better wetting and solder balling performance. Shelf life and tack time of the SnAgBi systems are also fairly good, while the solder appearance is at best considered average. The six alloys, 99.3Sn0.7Cu, 95.5Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu, 93.6Sn4.7Ag1.7Cu, 96.2Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.5Sb, 58Bi42Sn, and 95Sn5Sb, show fairly comparable performance to each other, with compatibility ranging from 19.3 to 20.3. In general, the whole group displays a quite noticeably poorer wetting than SnAgBi systems. 58Bi42Sn exhibits a fairly poor solder balling performance, but an outstanding solder appearance among lead-free systems. 96.2Sn2.5Ag0.8Cu0.5Sb shows a relatively poor performance in both wetting and solder appearance among these six alloys. 96.5Sn3.5Ag, rated 17.1 in compatibility, is ranked below the other alloys described above, mainly due to poor performance in solder balling, and particularly the poor wetting. 89Sn8Zn3Bi, rated only 2.2 in compatibility, falls far short in every category when compared with all other alloy systems. Obviously, this is attributable to the very reactive nature of zinc, which results in excessive oxidation of metal and excessive reaction with fluxes, and consequently a definitely unacceptable performance for solder paste applications. High-tin-content lead-free alloys seem to display a thicker IMC layer than eutectic SnPb when reflowed.

    pb-free, tack time, shelf life, solder appearance, solder balling, wetting, flux, paste, reflow, soldering, solder, lead-free

    Posted on 1 Jan 2009

The paper(s) you request will be e-mailed in .pdf format to the e-mail address you provide. Please allow up to an hour for the server to process your request.

All fields are required.

Share This